Can Contact Angle be an Indicator of Fabric Type?

Authors

  • Tania Dey The South India Textile Research Association, Coimbatore, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63456/tsrj-2-3-60

Keywords:

contact angle, FTIR, SEM, fibers, polymers, identification

Abstract

Recycling of textiles is a major problem and identifying fabric is an important part of it. The aim of this exploratory study was to find out if contact angle can serve as an indicator of fabric type or not. Three samples were successfully identified as cotton-satin polyester blend, poplin, and polyester blend with contact angles 140.72o (almost superhydrophobic), 92.97o (hydrophobic) and 58.22o (hydrophilic) respectively, while the remaining two with fast water absorbency were identified as pure cotton and georgette. It appeared that functional groups, surface treatment, blended material and weave pattern can affect surface roughness enormously. So, contact angle together with FTIR and supported by FESEM can reveal the true identity of an unknown fabric in most cases. A library creation is being proposed for quick reference.



References

[1] Elshabrawy, S.O., Elhady, S., Elhussieny, A., Dey, T. and Fahim, I.S. Preparation and characterization of face masks made of bagasse, starch and chitosan obtained from agricultural and food wastes. Environmental Sustainability. 2024. 7(3): 339–348. DOI: 10.1007/s42398-024-00320-0.

[2] Dey, T., Espinosa, M.C. and Ho, L. Alginate microbead to mitigate microplastic pollution. Colloid and Polymer Science. 2025. 303(10): 1853–1863. DOI: 10.1007/s00396-025-05451-2.

[3] Turan, R.B., Okur, A., Deveci, R. and Açikel, M. Predicting the intra-yarn porosity by image analysis method. Textile Research Journal. 2012. 82(16): 1720–1728. DOI: 10.1177/0040517511427971.

[4] Zaman, M.W., Han, J. and Zhang, X. Evaluating wettability of geotextiles with contact angles. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 2022. 50(4): 825–833. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.03.014.

[5] Wang, L., Xie, B., Hu, H., Bai, G., He, Z., Huang, Y., Liu, L. and Meng, C. Regulating the surface charge and reactivity of cellulose through quaternized modification to achieve salt-free reactive dyeing process. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2024. 281: 135898. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135898.

[6] Grancarić, A.M., Tarbuk, A., Hadžić, S. and Simončič, B. From raw to finished cotton – characterization by interface phenomena. AUTEX Research Journal. 2023. 23(2): 184–192. DOI: 10.2478/aut-2021-0055.

[7] Chatterjee, A., Dey, T., Sanyal, S.K. and Moulik, S.P. Thermodynamics of micelle formation and surface chemical behaviour of p-tert-octylphenoxypolyethylene ether (Triton X-100) in aqueous medium. Journal of Surface Science and Technology. 2001. 17(1–2): 1–15.

[8] Sandanuwan, T., Hendeniya, N., Amarasinghe, D.A.S., Attygalle, D. and Weragoda, S. The effect of atmospheric pressure plasma treatment on wetting and absorbance properties of cotton fabric. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021. 45(Part 6): 5065–5068. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.573.

[9] Romdhani, Z., Baffoun, A., Hamdaoui, M. and Roudesli, S. Drop impact on textile material: Effect of fabric properties. AUTEX Research Journal. 2014. 14(3): 145–151. DOI: 10.2478/AUT-2014-0010.

[10] Maghsoudi, K., Momen, G. and Jafari, R. The thermodynamic stability of the Cassie–Baxter regime determined by the geometric parameters of hierarchical superhydrophobic surfaces. Applied Materials Today. 2023. 34: 101893. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2023.101893.

[11] Dey, T. and Naughton, D. Nano-porous sol-gel derived hydrophobic glass coating for increased light transmittance through greenhouse. Materials Research Bulletin. 2019. 116: 126–130. DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2019.04.027.

[12] Kusuktham, B. Surface modification of polyester fabrics with vinyltriethoxysilane. Journal of Metals, Materials and Minerals. 2010. 20(2): 85–88.

[13] Kale, R.D., Potdar, T., Kane, P. and Singh, R. Nanocomposite polyester fabric based on graphene/titanium dioxide for conducting and UV protection functionality. Graphene Technology. 2018. 3(14): 35–46. DOI: 10.1007/s41127-018-0021-1.

[14] Vuckovac, M., Latikka, M., Liu, K., Huhtamäki, T. and Ras, R.H. Uncertainties in contact angle goniometry. Soft Matter. 2019. 15(35): 7089–7096. DOI: 10.1039/C9SM01221D

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Dey, T. (2026). Can Contact Angle be an Indicator of Fabric Type?. Textile Science & Research Journal, 2(3), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.63456/tsrj-2-3-60