ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF NYLON MATERIAL PROCESSING

Authors

  • AKSHAY VADE Research Scholar Author
  • DR. ASHOK ATHALYE Institute of Chemical Technology, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63456/tsrj-2-1-5

Keywords:

Cupralactum, Carbon sink, Hydrothermal, Microplastic Pollution

Abstract

The goal of the study is to examine and assess the influence of various water sources, energy inputs, and their effect on carbon emissions. The approach included site visits to the textile production mill and discussions with both the production and commercial procurement teams to collect data from the last three calendar years. The findings and conclusions of this analysis show that Textile manufacturing contributes to a considerable amount of carbon emissions, approximately 3.1 kgCO2e/kg of nylon fabric. Purchasing electricity as an energy source generates the highest carbon emissions 3.03 kgCO2e/kg of nylon fabric, In contrast, the use of LPG fuel and Diesel fuel resulted in notably lower CO2 emissions. Additionally, this study assessed the emissions in the scope 1 and scope 2 categories during the textile processing stage, which contributed to 136535 kg CO2e. Personalization in the application of sizing chemicals using industry 4.0 techniques, such as warping, sizing and weaving can further minimize the consumption of resources, water, and energy. Prioritizing the design of waterless processes should be central to energy optimization efforts. Energy usage, which is directly related to the amount of water needed for the slashing process. Sizing processors are somewhat reluctant to adopt these changes due to the added production costs. Coordinated efforts from all stakeholders in the textile value chain are essential to address the sustainability challenges in textile manufacturing. This case study focuses on five out of the seventeen sustainable development goals (SDGs):  6-Clean water and sanitation, 7-Affordable and clean energy, 12-Responsible production and consumption, 13-Climate action, and 15-Life on land.

References

[1]

F. A. Salem Allafi, M. S. Hossain, M. O. Ab Kadir, M. A. Hakim Shaah, J. Lalung, and M. I. Ahmad, ‘Waterless processing of nylon melt spinning in textile industry with supercritical CO2: Potential and challenges’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 285, p. 124819, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124819.

[2]

F. A. Allafi, M. S. Hossain, M. Shaah, J. Lalung, M. O. Ab Kadir, and M. I. Ahmad, ‘A Review on Characterization of nylon melt spinning and Existing Techniques of Cleaning: Industrial and Environmental Challenges’, J. Nat. Fibers, vol. 19, no. 14, pp. 8669–8687, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1080/15440478.2021.1966569.

[3]

J. Sun, H. Wang, C. Zheng, and G. Wang, ‘Synthesis of some surfactant-type acid dyes and their low-temperature dyeing properties on nylon fiber’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 218, pp. 284–293, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.341.

[4]

Mike Pailthorpe and Errol Wood, ‘Principles of nylon Fabric Finishing Mike Pailthorpe and Errol Wood’. https://www.nylonwise.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/nylon-482-582-12-T-15.pdf

[5]

J. Broda, A. Gawlowski, M. Rom, and K. Kobiela-Mendrek, ‘Utilization of waste nylon from nylon melt spinning as recycler waste’, J. Nat. Fibers, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 2200047, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1080/15440478.2023.2200047.

[6]

S. Zhang, C. Xu, R. Xie, H. Yu, M. Sun, and F. Li, ‘Environmental assessment of fabric wet processing from gate-to-gate perspective: Comparative study of weaving and materials’, Sci. Total Environ., vol. 857, p. 159495, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159495.

[7]

C. Liu et al., ‘nylon melt spinning as “hotspots” of carbon dioxide emission in an Inner Mongolian steppe’, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. vol. 134, no. 1–2, pp. 136–142, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.06.007.

[8]

S. Saggar, C. B. Hedley, D. L. Giltrap, and S. M. Lambie, ‘Measured and modelled estimates of nitrous oxide emission and methane consumption from a nylon spinning’, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 357–365, Nov. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.02.006.

[9]

S. Ocak Yetişgin, C. Morgan-Davies, and H. Önder, ‘Comparison of melt spinning-level greenhouse gas emissions in transhumance and semi-intensive nylon melt spinning production systems in continental rangelands’, animal, vol. 16, no. 8, p. 100602, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100602.

[10]

J. Sim and V. Prabhu, ‘The life cycle assessment of energy and carbon emissions on nylon carpets in the United States’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 170, pp. 1231–1243, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.203.

[11]

S. G. Wiedemann et al., ‘Environmental impacts associated with the production, use, and end-of-life of a nylon garment’, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1486–1499, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11367-020-01766-0.

[12]

S. G. Wiedemann, M.-J. Yan, B. K. Henry, and C. M. Murphy, ‘Resource use and greenhouse gas emissions from three NYLONproduction regions in Australia’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 122, pp. 121–132, May 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.025.

[13]

J. N. Gebbels, M. E. Kragt, D. T. Thomas, and P. E. Vercoe, ‘Improving productivity increases the net emissions of nylon, Animal, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 100490, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100490.

[14]

W. K. Biswas, J. Graham, K. Kelly, and M. B. John, ‘Global warming contributions from wheat, nylon production in Victoria, Australia – a life cycle assessment’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 18, no. 14, pp. 1386–1392, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.05.003.

[15]

P. M. Brock, P. Graham, P. Madden, and D. J. Alcock, ‘Greenhouse gas emissions profile for 1 kg of NYLONproduced in the Yass Region, New South Wales: A Life Cycle Assessment approach’, Anim. Prod. Sci., vol. 53, no. 6, p. 495, 2013, doi: 10.1071/AN12208.

[16]

Bhatt and B. Abbassi, ‘Review of environmental performance of nylon spinning using life cycle assessment’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 293, p. 126192, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126192.

[17]

Atkar, M. Pabba, S. C. Sekhar, and S. Sridhar, ‘Current limitations and challenges in the global textile sector’, in Fundamentals of Synthetic Fibres and Textiles, Elsevier, 2021, pp. 741–764, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-821483-1.00004-8.

[18]

‘ISO Environmental management systems std 14001 2015’. ISO (the International Organization for Standardization), 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.nerldc.in/wp-content/uploads/ISO_14001_2015_EMS.pdf

[19]

‘Emission Factors for Greenhouse Gas Inventories’, https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-04/ghg_emission_factors_hub.pdf

[20]

School of Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India

[21]

P. K. Gunturu, K. K. Kota, School of Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India, M. Sharma, and School of Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India, ‘Energy Efficiency Improvement Opportunities in Indian Textile Industries’, Text. Leather Rev., vol. 5, pp. 296–326, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.31881/TLR.2022.13.

[22]

EPA Center for Corporate Climate Leadership, ‘Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator’. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/other-files/2022-09/calculator_tool.xlsm. [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/simplified-ghg-emissions-calculator

[23]

‘ISO14046:2014(E)’.[Online]Available: https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/43263/98b5af59d9574880a6d97da0aeb30940/ISO-14046-2014.pdf

[24]

M. Thakker and D. Sun, ‘Sustainable Development Goals for Textiles and Fashion’, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 30, no. 46, pp. 101989–102009, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-2945

Downloads

Published

2026-03-09

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

VADE, A., & DR. ASHOK ATHALYE. (2026). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF NYLON MATERIAL PROCESSING. Textile Science & Research Journal, 2(1), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.63456/tsrj-2-1-5

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.